General Identity Protocol Logo

General Identity Protocol

VENDOR CASE STUDY

Strengths

  1. By building upon existing credential systems from reputable organisations (e.g., national IDs, banks), GIP can provide reliable assurance of user authenticity potentially including age without reinventing identity frameworks.

  2. It aims to eliminate friction in user workflows while maintaining strong security and remaining scalable.

  3. GIP functions across different contexts online, in-person, even over the phone and supports both named and anonymous authentication, offering adaptability for age assurance scenarios that may require either anonymity or identity linkage.

  4. The protocol relies on verified credentials instead of probabilistic methods (like behavioral biometrics or age inference).

Summary of Results

GIP is a networked identity framework that reuses trusted institutional credentials for secure, friction-free verification. It’s flexible, scalable, privacy-aware and aligns with AATT’s privacy, usability and integration principles.

Privacy Policy

In addition to the structured Practice Statements, the Trial also reviewed publicly available Privacy Policies for all participating providers. This formed a key part of the Trial’s ethical due diligence and helped assess how well declared practices aligned with actual documentation and observed system behaviour.

Practice Statement

Practice Statements are formal documents submitted by participating providers, outlining how their systems function and how they claim to meet specific expectations under international and domestic standards. They offer providers an opportunity to articulate their system’s design in their own words — similar to a ‘statement of practice’ or ‘system disclosure’ used in certification and compliance contexts.

Interview

As part of the Trial’s commitment to transparency and accuracy, the team prepared a written summary of each vendor interview, capturing key points regarding system design, functionality and implementation claims. These summaries were shared with participants for review, allowing them to check, verify and suggest corrections where necessary.

Test Report

Individual Vendor Test Reports were developed for each participating provider. These reports formally document the results of the functional, usability and security evaluations carried out during the Trial and are intended to support public understanding, regulatory scrutiny and future conformity assessment or certification processes.
Funded by
Project by
SUBSCRIBE TO GET UPDATES
We will publish regular newsletters with updates on our progress, and links to published documentation.
© 2025
 Age Assurance Technology Trial
Created with Heartburst