Meta Logo

Meta

VENDOR CASE STUDY

Strengths

Meta emphasises a multi-layered, privacy-conscious age assurance approach, with several notable strengths:

  1. Multiple verification options: Users can confirm age via ID upload, video selfies processed through Yoti (which deletes images after age estimation) or social vouching—offering flexibility and privacy .

  2. AI‑driven detection: Proprietary systems (e.g., adult classifier) analyse behavior, profile data and birthday messages to flag potential misrepresentation .

  3. Age‑appropriate defaults and protections: Teen accounts default to stricter settings—private profiles, content limitations, nighttime notification blocks and parental supervision tools.

Together, these elements—choice, technology, thoughtful defaults, systemic scalability and privacy safeguards—constitute the strengths of Meta’s age assurance strategy.

Summary of Results

Forward‑looking, systemic thinking: Meta advocates for age verification at the app store or device setup level, reducing repeated data requests and enhancing privacy. It emphasises that this is in addition to, not instead of, its own age assurance obligations.

Privacy sensitivity and regulatory collaboration: Meta designs verification with minimal data retention (e.g., encrypted storage, deletion of biometric inputs) and aligns tools with expert guidance and emerging global regulations .

Privacy Policy

In addition to the structured Practice Statements, the Trial also reviewed publicly available Privacy Policies for all participating providers. This formed a key part of the Trial’s ethical due diligence and helped assess how well declared practices aligned with actual documentation and observed system behaviour.

Practice Statement

Practice Statements are formal documents submitted by participating providers, outlining how their systems function and how they claim to meet specific expectations under international and domestic standards. They offer providers an opportunity to articulate their system’s design in their own words — similar to a ‘statement of practice’ or ‘system disclosure’ used in certification and compliance contexts.

Interview

As part of the Trial’s commitment to transparency and accuracy, the team prepared a written summary of each vendor interview, capturing key points regarding system design, functionality and implementation claims. These summaries were shared with participants for review, allowing them to check, verify and suggest corrections where necessary.

Test Report

Individual Vendor Test Reports were developed for each participating provider. These reports formally document the results of the functional, usability and security evaluations carried out during the Trial and are intended to support public understanding, regulatory scrutiny and future conformity assessment or certification processes.
Funded by
Project by
SUBSCRIBE TO GET UPDATES
We will publish regular newsletters with updates on our progress, and links to published documentation.
© 2025
 Age Assurance Technology Trial
Created with Heartburst