My Mahi Logo

MyMahi

VENDOR CASE STUDY

Erratum: The MyMahi solution was included in the Age Inference volume of the published report, misunderstanding that their assessment of age is based on school year group. MyMahi verifies age from the date of birth held in school records.

Strengths

• No requirement for a passport, driver’s licence, or credit card. 

• Designed to avoid excluding students who may lack traditional identity documents. 

• Consent checkpoints ensure understanding and control. 

• Privacy-preserving by design, with minimal data exposure.

Summary of Results

Conceptually strong use of verified school data for age-bound credential issuance. However, practical deployment of age inference (e.g. age range detection without explicit credentials) is still emerging. Rated at TRL9, MyMahi is considered to be ready for deployment in educational settings.

Privacy Policy

In addition to the structured Practice Statements, the Trial also reviewed publicly available Privacy Policies for all participating providers. This formed a key part of the Trial’s ethical due diligence and helped assess how well declared practices aligned with actual documentation and observed system behaviour.

Practice Statement

Practice Statements are formal documents submitted by participating providers, outlining how their systems function and how they claim to meet specific expectations under international and domestic standards. They offer providers an opportunity to articulate their system’s design in their own words — similar to a ‘statement of practice’ or ‘system disclosure’ used in certification and compliance contexts.

Interview

As part of the Trial’s commitment to transparency and accuracy, the team prepared a written summary of each vendor interview, capturing key points regarding system design, functionality and implementation claims. These summaries were shared with participants for review, allowing them to check, verify and suggest corrections where necessary.

Test Report

Individual Vendor Test Reports were developed for each participating provider. These reports formally document the results of the functional, usability and security evaluations carried out during the Trial and are intended to support public understanding, regulatory scrutiny and future conformity assessment or certification processes.
Funded by
Project by
SUBSCRIBE TO GET UPDATES
We will publish regular newsletters with updates on our progress, and links to published documentation.
© 2026
 Age Assurance Technology Trial
Created with Heartburst